The Crisis of the Ballot Box: Democratic Strengthening and Electoral Reforms in India

1. Abstract

In 1951-52, independent India held its first general elections, marking the inception of a continuous democratic electoral process. India's democratic framework, anchored by universal adult franchise, stands as the largest electoral exercise globally and is a foundational element of its national identity. The integrity of the election process is far more than a mere procedural detail; it is the fundamental guarantor of popular sovereignty and a critical determinant of national stability.

In recent years, a vigorous public debate has emerged concerning the reliability and transparency of the electoral mechanism. Concerns related to the accuracy of voter rolls, the technical and procedural security of voting machines, and the overall independence of electoral oversight bodies have intensified. These concerns, often encapsulated by the potent and colloquial term "vote chori" (vote theft), represent a significant challenge to public faith in the democratic process.

This white paper comprehensively examines the critical need for electoral reforms to strengthen democratic institutions in India. It proposes a series of actionable reforms aimed at restoring public trust and ensuring the unimpeachable integrity of the ballot. Furthermore, it thoroughly discusses the various deficits in India's electoral functions. Ultimately, this paper argues that a robust, transparent, and trusted electoral process is fundamental to the long-term health, legitimacy, and resilience of India's democracy.

2. Introduction

2.1 Background

The modern Indian nation-state formally came into existence on August 15, 1947. Since then, free and fair elections have been consistently held at regular intervals, in strict adherence to the principles enshrined in the Constitution, electoral laws, and the established system. The monumental task of conducting elections across India is entrusted to the Election Commission of India (ECI), an autonomous constitutional body established under Article 324¹ of the Constitution. The ECI is solely responsible for the superintendence, direction, and control of the entire electoral process for elections to the Parliament, State Legislatures, and the offices of the President and Vice President.

The electoral process itself is meticulously rigorous, commencing with the continuous updating of voter lists, followed by the official notification of election dates, the stringent enforcement of the Model Code of Conduct (MCC), and the extensive deployment of security personnel and polling staff. Voting is predominantly conducted using Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs), which are paired with the Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT)system. This innovative system is specifically designed to provide a physical, auditable record of every vote cast, thereby combining the efficiency of electronic voting with the transparency and verifiability of a paper-based system.

The first general elections of 1951–52, meticulously organized and executed by the Election Commission of India, constituted a bold and unprecedented experiment in universal adult franchise. This landmark event granted every citizen above the age of 21 the fundamental right to vote, irrespective of their caste, class, gender, or literacy level. At the time, the sheer scale of this exercise was unparalleled: over 173 million citizens were eligible to vote, with a staggering 85% of them being illiterate. Despite formidable logistical challenges and widespread skepticism, the elections were successfully conducted, earning global admiration and firmly establishing democratic participation as an indelible cornerstone of India’s national identity.

Over the ensuing decades, successive elections have consistently reinforced this democratic ethos, providing citizens with a powerful means to express their political will and ensuring peaceful and orderly transfers of power. The electoral process has evolved to become not only a vital mechanism of governance but also a profound source of legitimacy, sovereignty, and stability for the Indian state. In many crucial ways, the enduring success of India’s democratic experiment is intrinsically measured through the credibility and trustworthiness of its electoral institutions.

¹ This Article of the Indian Constitution states that the superintendence, direction, and control of elections are to be vested in an Election Commission.

2.2 The Current State of Electoral Trust

The democratic foundations of India are currently facing unprecedented challenges, necessitating urgent attention and comprehensive reform. The country's electoral framework is in dire need of significant improvement to ensure the continued conduct of free, fair, and transparent elections. In recent years, however, the integrity of the electoral process has become the subject of vigorous public debate, leading to a noticeable erosion of public trust. Citizens have consistently raised legitimate concerns about perceived vulnerabilities within the system, sparking discussions that cut across technical, administrative, and institutional dimensions.

It is therefore imperative that the Government of India and the electoral authorities take concrete and decisive steps to address these concerns and implement robust reforms that can unequivocally restore the faith of citizens in the electoral system. This paper proposes a comprehensive series of reforms aimed at strengthening the electoral framework, including measures to significantly improve voter list accuracy, enhance the transparency of voting technology, and unequivocally ensure the independence of electoral institutions. By implementing these vital reforms, India can take a significant and decisive step towards consolidating its democratic foundations and ensuring that the true will of the people is accurately reflected in the outcome of all elections, thereby strengthening the legitimacy of the entire democratic process. Through these methods, India can significantly enhance the integrity and reliability of its electoral system, thereby safeguarding the fundamental right to vote, which remains a cornerstone of democratic participation and a vital component of a healthy, functioning democracy.

2.3 Methodology

The research for this white paper employs a mixed-methods approach, strategically combining a comprehensive review of existing literature, relevant legal frameworks, and publicly available data with original primary research. This approach is designed to provide both foundational historical context and contemporary stakeholder perspectives. A case study focusing on the electoral bond issue of 2024 is also thoroughly covered within this paper. This rigorous methodology is designed to ensure that the recommendations are empirically grounded, contextually relevant, and directly address the immediate and pressing concerns surrounding electoral integrity in India.

3. Analysis of the Existing Framework and Challenges

The strength and vitality of India’s democracy depend not only on the efficient conduct of elections but critically on the credibility and public trust in the processes that underpin them. While the nation’s electoral system has often been celebrated globally for its immense scale and remarkable resilience, persistent shortcomings continue to exist and, in many instances, undermine public confidence. These inherent deficits can be broadly understood across four interrelated and critical areas:

3.1 Constitutional Framework - Article 324

Article 324 of the Indian Constitution grants the Election Commission of India (ECI) the expansive authority to conduct and supervise elections, with Parliament retaining the power to enact laws to give effect to this Article. This provision establishes a strong constitutional basis for an independent electoral authority, which is absolutely essential for democratic legitimacy. However, the broad and somewhat general text of Article 324 intentionally leaves important procedural and appointment-related details to subsequent legislation and conventional practices. This creates potential pressure points, particularly concerning the appointment procedures for election commissioners, their tenure protections, and restrictions on post-retirement activities, all of which can significantly affect the perceived independence of the ECI. Constitutional authority alone does not automatically immunize the ECI from public perceptions of partiality; such perceptions heavily hinge on the transparency of its processes and the effectiveness of established checks and balances.

3.2 Administrative Framework - The Election Commission of India

The ECI effectively exercises its authority derived from Article 324 and various statutory powers to meticulously prepare electoral rolls, supervise the conduct of polls, strictly enforce the Model Code of Conduct (MCC), deploy independent observers, and accurately certify election results. It issues detailed operational directives, comprehensive manuals, and frequently asked questions (FAQs)—for instance, on EVM usage and specific polling procedures. The Model Code of Conduct, a powerful instrument developed by the ECI, constrains campaign behavior during election periods. The ECI has developed extensive administrative systems, encompassing officer deployment, rigorous training programs, and complex logistical arrangements, all designed to manage India's enormous electoral scale. The deployment of central observers, stringent expenditure monitoring, and robust polling logistics represent significant practical strengths of the administrative framework.

However, the appointment, tenure, and post-service rules for election commissioners have consistently been subjects of contention. The absence of a judicial or parliamentary selection mechanism raises legitimate concerns about potentially politicized appointments, thereby impacting the perceived impartiality of the ECI. Furthermore, transparency gaps persist; some critical administrative datasets are not consistently published in machine-readable, auditable formats, limiting public scrutiny and independent analysis.

3.3 Technology Framework - EVMs and VVPATs

India has progressively adopted Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) primarily to increase voting efficiency and significantly reduce instances of ballot-box tampering and electoral fraud. The ECI proactively provides public FAQs and detailed operational protocols for the effective use of EVMs. In direct response to growing demands for greater transparency and verifiability, Voter-Verified Paper Audit Trails (VVPATs) were introduced in a phased manner and were comprehensively implemented nationwide by 2019 for Lok Sabha polls. The Supreme Court has, in the past, specifically directed the greater use of VVPATs to further strengthen the verifiability of votes.

EVMs have demonstrably reduced the number of invalid ballots and significantly speeded up the vote counting process. VVPATs add a crucial auditable paper record for verification purposes. Standardized technical protocols, coupled with the ECI's strict chain-of-custody and storage rules, are rigorously implemented to physically and procedurally secure the machines.

Despite these measures, public doubts regrettably persist regarding the tamperability of EVMs and the sufficiency of existing audit processes. Some researchers have presented theoretical demonstrations of vulnerabilities, and even where these demonstrations were contested or legally constrained, they unfortunately feed into public skepticism. While VVPATs successfully produce paper slips, large-scale, routine cross-checks (beyond the currently limited random VVPAT counts) are not always implemented. The scope of post-poll audits and the public disclosure of audit results also frequently vary, contributing to a lack of complete transparency.

3.4 Financial Framework - Political Funding and Electoral Bonds

Campaign finance in India is governed by a complex set of regulations, including income-tax rules, stringent party registration requirements, mandatory election expense reporting by candidates, and, until recently, the highly controversial electoral bond scheme. This scheme introduced a banking-channel method through which donors could contribute anonymously to political parties via the State Bank of India. The electoral bond scheme, alongside related legislative changes, drew intense public scrutiny, numerous legal challenges, and ultimately, a landmark judicial review. Statutory reporting requirements for candidate expenditure and party accounts (including audit and filing obligations) are also in place.

Even with the Supreme Court’s decisive 2024 judgment to strike down the electoral bond scheme—a major corrective step highlighted in our case study—systemic reforms regarding disclosure, contribution limits, public access to donor information, and robust enforcement remain absolutely necessary to ensure true financial transparency in Indian politics.

3.5 Model Code of Conduct

The Model Code of Conduct (MCC) is a crucial ECI instrument that becomes active during election periods. It meticulously sets norms for appropriate campaign behavior, regulates the use of official machinery, addresses hate speech, and outlines other critical aspects of campaign conduct. The ECI also strategically deploys central and state observers, expenditure monitors, and utilizes extensive police and administration coordination to ensure free and fair polling. The MCC provides a vital moral and practical framework that helps shape campaign behavior and gives the ECI legitimate grounds to take action against violations.

However, a significant limitation is that the MCC is not statutory law, which means its enforcement is primarily constrained to ECI sanctions and referrals to other agencies for prosecution. This often results in a slower immediate remediation process. Furthermore, observer reports and enforcement decisions are not always fully transparent publicly, which unfortunately limits independent review of ECI enforcement practices and outcomes.

3.6 Transparency and Public Accountability

Transparency in India’s electoral process is partially delivered through various ECI publications, including statistical reports, comprehensive guidelines, and press releases, as well as through polling station data. However, the formats and completeness of this information can significantly vary. Access to machine-readable datasets (e.g., changes to voter rolls, observer reports, complaints, and redress outcomes) is inconsistent. While key high-level data such as voter turnout, election results, and basic electoral rolls are publicly available, and the ECI issues detailed operational manuals, the lack of consistent, standardized, and machine-readable public datasets makes independent audit and civil-society verification exceptionally difficult. Limited routine, randomized post-poll audits (beyond selected VVPAT counts) further reduce the systemic detectability of irregularities, hindering true public accountability.

4. Case Study - Electoral Bond Issue 2024

On February 15, 2024, the Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment declaring the "Electoral Bond Scheme and the provisions of the Finance Act 2017 unconstitutional." This decision was primarily based on the grounds that the scheme violates the right to information and freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, as it could fundamentally lead to a quid pro quo² exchange.

The main point of contention regarding electoral bonds was their significant potential for reducing transparency in political funding. The Electoral Bond Scheme permitted individuals, corporations, and other entities to purchase electoral bonds from designated branches of the State Bank of India (SBI) and subsequently donate them to political parties. However, the scheme became embroiled in deep controversy due to widespread concerns over its potential to facilitate anonymous donations and a complete lack of transparency. Electoral bonds were issued by the State Bank of India in multiples ranging from ₹1,000 to ₹10,000, and upwards. Crucially, the bonds did not carry the name of the donor, and the only visible detail was the amount of the bond. The purchased bonds could then be donated to any eligible political party, which could encash them through its designated bank account within 15 days of issuance. This anonymity and lack of transparency was one of the primary reasons for the criticism leveled against this scheme, as it ultimately undermined the ability of citizens to hold political parties accountable for their sources of funding, which in turn eroded public trust in the political process and democratic institutions.

The electoral bond scheme faced several legal challenges, primarily on the grounds that it fundamentally violated the right to information and transparency in political funding. The authorized Bank, the SBI, was directed by the Court to submit comprehensive details of the Bonds purchased by contributors and redeemed by political parties between April 12, 2019 (the date on which an interim order was passed by the Court directing the ECI to collect details of the contributions) and February 15, 2024 (the date of the judgment). The Court explicitly directed the SBI to submit the details of each Electoral Bond purchased, including the date of purchase, the name of the purchaser, and the denomination of the Electoral Bond, as well as the specific political party to which it was donated and the corresponding amount, by March 6, 2024.

The ECI was subsequently directed to collate the information submitted by the SBI and to publish it on its official website by March 13, 2024. The Court issued various explicit orders, such as: "the issuing bank shall forthwith stop the issuance of Electoral Bonds. SBI shall submit details of the Electoral Bonds purchased since the Interim order of this Court dated 12 April 2019 till date to the ECI. The details shall contain every single bit of information. SBI shall submit all the information to the ECI within three weeks from the date of this judgment and the ECI shall publish the information shared by the SBI on its official website within one week of the receipt of the information. Electoral Bonds which are within the validity period of fifteen days but that which have not been encashed by the political party yet shall be returned by the political party or the purchaser depending on who is in possession of the bond to the issuing bank. The issuing bank, upon the return of the valid bond, shall refund the amount to the purchaser's account."

Two days before the expiry of the deadline, the SBI filed a Miscellaneous Application to the Court, seeking an extension of time until June 30, 2024, for complying with the directions. The petitioners before this Court—the Association for Democratic Reforms and the Communist Party of India (Marxist)—subsequently instituted a petition invoking the contempt jurisdiction of the Court against SBI for willful disobedience of the Court's order. The counsel submitted that the task could indeed be completed within three weeks. While evaluating the submission made on behalf of the SBI, a reference to some of the key aspects of the Scheme would be in order at this stage. Due to Clause 7(4)³ of the scheme, SBI is mandated to disclose information when demanded by a court. What had to be analyzed was whether SBI was justified in seeking an extension of time. The SBI sought an extension on the ground that the process of “decoding the Electoral Bonds and matching the donor to the donations” was a complex and time-consuming exercise. To substantiate this argument, the SBI had supported it with a lot of reasons, but the plea was decisively rejected by the Supreme Court. The Court further stated: “During the proceedings before the Constitution Bench, ECI filed statements in accordance with the Court's interim order, which are now in their custody. The ECI will keep copies of the statements filed before this Court in their office. ECI will promptly publish the information provided to this Court in accordance with the interim orders on its official website.” The Court firmly warned: “The Court may take action against SBI for willful disobedience if they do not comply with the deadlines outlined in the judgement dated February 15, 2024.”

The introduction of electoral bonds had significantly altered the pattern of political funding in India. While the scheme aimed to promote clean political donations, the challenges of transparency and accountability necessitated immediate attention. Implementing further reforms will undoubtedly help India move towards a much better political funding system, strengthening the integrity of its democratic processes and ensuring that political parties remain truly accountable to the citizens they serve.

² ‘Something for something’, implying a reciprocal exchange, often with an underlying expectation of favor or benefit. ³ A clause of the Electoral Bond Scheme which stipulates that the information furnished by the buyer of an Electoral Bond shall be treated as confidential by the authorized bank and shall be disclosed only when called upon to do so by a competent court or upon the registration of an offense by a law enforcement agency.

5. Proposed Reforms for Strengthening the Election System

5.1 The Need for Robust Voter Verification Mechanisms

The very foundation of a fair and credible election lies in an accurate and up-to-date voter list. Instances of "fake votes" often originate from a manipulated or flawed voter roll. While India currently utilizes voter ID cards, the strict enforcement of a photo ID requirement, coupled with easily obtainable alternative identification for those without one, is crucial to ensuring that only legitimately registered voters cast a ballot.

A reliable and accurate voter list is undeniably the bedrock of a credible electoral process. However, India's voter lists have historically been plagued by inaccuracies, including duplicate entries, records of deceased individuals, and ineligible voters. To comprehensively address these systemic issues, the Election Commission of India (ECI) must implement robust voter verification mechanisms. This should include the judicious use of biometric data and artificial intelligence-powered tools designed to detect and systematically eliminate duplicate entries.

Furthermore, the ECI should actively consider implementing a real-time voter list update mechanism. Such a system would allow citizens to easily verify their eligibility to vote and receive immediate updates on the status of their voter registration, thereby significantly enhancing the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the electoral process. This can be achieved through the development of a user-friendly online portal, where citizens can effortlessly access and manage their voter information, promptly report any discrepancies, and receive timely notifications about upcoming elections. In addition, this online portal should be seamlessly integrated with social media platforms and mobile applications to reach a wider audience, potentially leveraging advanced technology like Aadhaar-linking (while meticulously addressing and safeguarding all privacy concerns) to eliminate duplicate entries and ensure the unimpeachable accuracy of voter lists.

Critically, involving independent observers and representatives from all recognized political parties in every stage of the polling process—from the initial opening of the booth to the final sealing of the ballot boxes—is paramount to enhancing transparency and public accountability.

5.2 Ensuring Transparency and Accountability in Electoral Processes

Transparency and accountability are absolutely essential components of a healthy and vibrant democracy, and the electoral process is certainly no exception. To ensure the integrity of the electoral process, the ECI must prioritize unwavering transparency in the use of all voting technology. This includes the mandatory use of verifiable paper trails, the implementation of highly secure electronic voting systems, and the adoption of open-source software for critical components. Moreover, the Election Commission must unequivocally ensure that the entire electoral process, from the initial voter registration to the final vote counting, is subjected to rigorous, independent audits and third-party evaluations to guarantee the accuracy and absolute reliability of the results.

5.3 Technology Enhancement

While the ECI has consistently defended the integrity of EVMs, there have been persistent demands for greater transparency and a more extensive audit of VVPAT slips. To significantly boost public confidence, a statistically significant, random sample of VVPAT slips should be manually counted and meticulously matched with the corresponding EVM results. A full, 100% VVPAT count could also be a consideration, although it is acknowledged that this would be a highly resource-intensive measure.

The introduction of 'totaliser' machines, which aggregate votes from multiple EVMs before revealing individual booth results, could further enhance vote secrecy at the booth level. Some critics have also strongly called for the use of open-source software in EVMs. This would allow independent experts and the public to meticulously examine the code for any potential vulnerabilities, thereby ensuring that there are no hidden malicious programs. Publishing real-time, booth-by-booth results on a secure, publicly accessible platform can make the vote-counting process far more transparent and allow for quicker detection of any irregularities.

5.4 Campaigning and Finance

To foster greater fairness and accountability, a comprehensive, public disclosure regime for all donations (while incorporating reasonable privacy safeguards for individual donors) must be established. This needs to be accompanied by tightened enforcement mechanisms and clear, unambiguous limits and sanctions for violations.

Furthermore, introducing digital campaign regulations is crucial to effectively combat the pervasive spread of misinformation and disinformation on social media platforms during election periods, ensuring campaigns remain in line with the spirit of the Model Code of Conduct. This could involve collaborating with leading tech companies for rapid detection and takedown of false content, alongside the implementation of strict penalties for offenders who intentionally spread such misinformation.

5.5 Legal and Procedural Reforms

Granting the ECI more autonomy and expanded powers to swiftly investigate and prosecute electoral offenses can act as a powerful deterrent. The government could also introduce fast-track courts specifically dedicated to resolving cases of electoral malpractice. This would ensure that punishments are delivered in a timely manner, often years before after the offense occurred. Implementing strict penalties for any election official found to be complicit in fraud would unequivocally reinforce the integrity and impartiality of the electoral institution itself.

6. Conclusion: A Trusted Electoral Process for India's Democracy

India’s democracy has always drawn profound strength from the fundamental principle that power ultimately flows from the people and is legitimately exercised through free, fair, and regular elections. Since 1951–52, this foundational system of universal adult franchise has not only legitimized governance but has also remarkably unified a diverse nation under a shared political covenant. Yet, as this paper has comprehensively demonstrated, the credibility of this foundational process cannot, and must not, be taken for granted. The enduring strength of India’s democracy is inextricably linked to the perceived and actual integrity of its electoral institutions.

As this paper has demonstrated, while the Election Commission of India (ECI) possesses vast constitutional authority under Article 324, this authority is currently undermined by critical procedural and structural deficiencies that compromise its operational independence and public trust. The vibrant public debate surrounding the 2024 general elections and the landmark judicial intervention in the electoral bond case unequivocally underscore a central truth: citizens demand, and the democratic process absolutely requires, an electoral framework that is entirely insulated from executive influence and transparent in its operation.

The constitutional framework continues to enshrine free and fair elections as a core feature of India’s democracy, yet its interpretation has not always been accompanied by sufficient institutional autonomy in practice. The administrative and technological frameworks—ranging from the voter registration process to the innovative use of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trails (VVPATs)—represent a significant modernization of the electoral process. However, they also introduce new and pressing demands for enhanced transparency and rigorous public verification. Similarly, the financial framework and the Model Code of Conduct are undeniably vital tools for ensuring equity among political contenders, yet their enforcement regrettably remains inconsistent and, in many instances, vulnerable to political influence.

The Electoral Bonds Case (2024) starkly illustrates how the intersection of political finance, institutional independence, and public accountability can profoundly reshape the legitimacy of the entire democratic process. The Supreme Court’s decisive decision to strike down the Electoral Bonds Scheme unequivocally reaffirmed the constitutional commitment to transparency in political funding and emphasized that even well-intentioned reforms must align with the fundamental democratic principles of openness and equal access to information.

By reaffirming the sanctity of the ballot box and ensuring that every vote is both meticulously counted and unequivocally trusted, India can preserve the democratic promise that has guided it since independence: a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. It should be emphasized that strengthening the electoral process is not a partisan issue but a collective responsibility to ensure that the will of the people is accurately reflected in election results. Public trust and accountability must be ensured for a democracy to truly thrive. Thus, by implementing these recommended reforms, which are specifically centered on achieving greater independence, transparency, and accountability, India will not merely be patching up an existing system but will be fundamentally reaffirming its profound commitment to the principle that the will of the people, freely and fairly expressed, is the ultimate source of state legitimacy and the key to securing the unwavering support of the citizens of the nation.

7. Bibliography

1. “About ECI.” Eci.gov.in, 2025, www.eci.gov.in/about-eci

2. “Article 324: Superintendence, Direction and Control of Elections to Be Vested in an Election Commission - Constitution of India.” Constitution of India, 8 May 2024, [www.constitutionofindia.net/articles/article-324-superintendence-direction-and-control-of-elections-to-be-vested-in-an-election-commission/?utm_source=chatgpt.com](www.constitutionofindia.net/articles/article-324-superintendence-direction-and-control-of-elections-to-be-vested-in-an-election-commission/?utm_source=chatgpt.c om)

3. Dash, Siddhartha. Orissa Review. Apr. 2008, magazines.odisha.gov.in/Orissareview/2008/april-2008/engpdf/42-43.pdf

4. Gandhi, Rahul. “Vote Chori - Google Drive.” Google Drive, 2024, drive.google.com/drive/folders/1u-FHzqZiMpO8IZ0qxHS-XqWQRFoJ-yEp

5. Sunkad, Gayatri. “The Election System in India.” Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs, vol. 7, no. 1, Longdom Publishing S.L, 2019, pp. 1–2,

6. IN the SUPREME COURT of INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION. Feb. 2024,

7. India Today. “Opposition vs EC: Vote ‘Chori’ Fight Spirals, Rahul Gandhi Leads Oppn Huddle | India Today.” YouTube, 11 July 2025,

8. JACINTO, Leela. “Trust Deficit at the Heart of India’s Electronic Voting Debate.” France 24, FRANCE 24, 3 May 2024,

9. Kashyap, Gauri. “A Complete Timeline of the Electoral Bond Scheme.” Supreme Court Observer, 14 May 2024,

10. Kashyap, Gauri. “Electoral Bonds | Supreme Court Orders Complete Disclosure of Transaction Details from SBI - Supreme Court Observer.” Supreme Court Observer, 18 Mar. 2024,

11. Mahajan, Shelly, and Maj Anil Verma. Transparency and Accountability in Political Funding.

12. Tyre, Jim. “Supreme Court of India - Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trails Must Be Used.” Electronic Frontier Foundation, 9 Oct. 2013,

13. Vajiram Editor. “Electoral Reforms in India: Challenges and the Path Forward.” User’s Blog, vajiramandravi, 17 Mar. 2025,

14. Eci.gov.in, 2025,

15. “Election Commission of India.” Eci.gov.in, 2024,

16. Team, CA. “Electoral Transparency: Significance & Challenges.” PMF IAS, 20 June 2025,