The Trees | CBSE Class 10 English Notes
On this page
Who wrote "The Trees" and what is it about?
Adrienne Rich was born in Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A., in 1929. She is the author of nearly twenty volumes of poetry and has been called a feminist and a radical poet. "The Trees" imagines trees that are somehow living inside a house suddenly coming alive at night and making their way back out to the forest, without explaining how they came to be there.
The poem opens with a question the chapter itself poses before the lines begin: can there be a forest without trees? Where are the trees in this poem, and where do they go? The poem answers this at once: the trees inside a house are moving out "into the forest, the forest that was empty all these days".
Through four stanzas the poet traces this escape: the roots pulling free of the veranda floor, the leaves and twigs straining towards the glass, the speaker sitting indoors writing letters, and finally the glass breaking as the trees stumble out into the night while the moon shatters above them.
The poem can be read literally, as a strange, dreamlike event, or more symbolically, as a comment on how growing things kept for "interior decoration" long to break free. The chapter's own closing questions push the reader towards this second, symbolic reading, inviting comparison with another poem about the relationship between people and the natural world, "A Tiger in the Zoo", and with "On Killing a Tree" by Gieve Patel.
Because the poem gives almost no direct explanation of why the trees were brought indoors in the first place, much of its meaning depends on how a reader fills that gap: as a plain event in a house with unusual house-plants, or as an image of something confined that finally forces its way back to where it belongs.
What happens in the poem, stanza by stanza?
Stanza 1: the empty forest will be filled again
The poem begins with the trees moving out of the house "into the forest, the forest that was empty all these days".
The poet explains why the forest was empty: "no bird could sit / no insect hide / no sun bury its feet in shadow".
By morning, she says, the forest "will be full of trees" once more, so the stanza sets up the central idea that something unnatural, trees kept indoors, is about to be put right.
Stanza 2: roots, leaves and boughs struggle to get free
All through the night the roots work "to disengage themselves from the cracks / in the veranda floor". The leaves "strain toward the glass" and the small twigs are "stiff with exertion".
The long-cramped boughs go "shuffling under the roof / like newly discharged patients / half-dazed, moving / to the clinic doors", a simile that makes the trees seem weak and disoriented after being confined for so long.
Stanza 3: the speaker writes letters and says nothing
The speaker sits inside, with the doors open to the veranda, "writing long letters / in which I scarcely mention the departure / of the forest from the house".
She notices that the night is fresh, the whole moon "shines in a sky still open", and the smell of leaves and lichen "still reaches like a voice into the rooms", even as the escape is already underway.
Stanza 4: the glass breaks and the moon is broken too
The speaker's "head is full of whispers / which tomorrow will be silent". She hears the glass breaking as "the trees are stumbling forward / into the night" and the winds "rush to meet them".
The whole moon of stanza three is now "broken like a mirror", its pieces flashing "in the crown / of the tallest oak", so that the natural world outside has completely changed by the poem's end.
What poetic devices does the poet use in this poem?
Rich builds the whole poem on an extended personification: trees are given the ability to feel, move and struggle, as when "the roots work / to disengage themselves" or the leaves "strain toward the glass". Even the small twigs are described as "stiff with exertion", a human reaction to physical effort applied to plant matter.
This personification turns a strange, almost supernatural event into something the reader can picture as a living, bodily effort, so that the trees seem less like scenery and more like characters undergoing a difficult, drawn-out escape.
The poem also uses striking similes. The boughs move "like newly discharged patients / half-dazed", comparing plants to weakened hospital patients unsteady on their feet, and at the close "the moon is broken like a mirror", comparing moonlight scattered among leaves to shards of broken glass.
The smell of "leaves and lichen" is said to reach the rooms "like a voice", linking scent to sound through a further simile, as though the forest were calling to the speaker rather than merely drifting in on the night air.
Rich uses careful imagery of sound and sight together: "Listen. The glass is breaking" appeals to hearing, commanding the reader to pay attention, while "its pieces flash now in the crown / of the tallest oak" appeals to sight, picturing scattered light caught among high branches.
The poem is written in free verse, with no regular rhyme scheme and no fixed line length, and uses enjambment (lines running on without a pause) to mirror the slow, continuous effort of the trees moving, for example "the forest that was empty all these days / where no bird could sit". The lack of punctuation at several line breaks lets one image flow into the next, much as the trees' movement is continuous rather than broken into separate stages.
The title itself works as a quiet device: "The Trees" names the subject plainly, giving no hint of the strangeness that follows, so the ordinary title contrasts with the unusual, almost fantastic action the stanzas describe.
What are the themes of "The Trees"?
Nature confined indoors wants to break free
The poem's central theme is of growing things kept indoors, perhaps as "interior decoration" as the textbook questions suggest, straining to return to the wild.
The roots disengaging from "cracks / in the veranda floor" and the boughs "shuffling under the roof" show nature's discomfort at being confined within a house built for people, not plants.
Trees as a metaphor for human beings
The textbook notes that Rich has used trees elsewhere in her poetry as a metaphor for human beings. Read this way, the poem can suggest people who feel cramped or constrained breaking out of confinement, with the "half-dazed" boughs resembling people disoriented after a long period of restriction.
Silence about unexpected or embarrassing change
The speaker "scarcely" mentions the departure of the forest in her letters, even though it is happening around her. This suggests a theme about how people often stay silent about important, unexpected happenings, perhaps because such events embarrass or unsettle them.
The disruption of the night sky
The whole moon that "shines in a sky still open" in stanza three becomes "broken like a mirror" by stanza four. This change links the trees' escape to a wider disturbance of the natural order, as if the forest's return unsettles even the moon and sky.
What are the key quotations in "The Trees"?
The following lines are among the most often quoted from each stanza, with brief context for how they fit the poem's movement from an empty forest to a changed night sky.
"The trees inside are moving out into the forest" — Adrienne Rich, "The Trees", stanza 1.
"no bird could sit / no insect hide / no sun bury its feet in shadow" — Adrienne Rich, "The Trees", stanza 1.
"long-cramped boughs shuffling under the roof / like newly discharged patients" — Adrienne Rich, "The Trees", stanza 2.
"I sit inside, doors open to the veranda / writing long letters" — Adrienne Rich, "The Trees", stanza 3.
"The night is fresh, the whole moon shines / in a sky still open" — Adrienne Rich, "The Trees", stanza 3.
"My head is full of whispers / which tomorrow will be silent." — Adrienne Rich, "The Trees", stanza 4.
"The glass is breaking. The trees are stumbling forward / into the night." — Adrienne Rich, "The Trees", stanza 4.
"The moon is broken like a mirror, / its pieces flash now in the crown / of the tallest oak." — Adrienne Rich, "The Trees", stanza 4.
Read in order, these eight lines trace the poem's whole arc: an empty forest waiting to be filled, the effort of roots, leaves and boughs breaking free, the speaker's quiet, almost evasive letters, and finally the dramatic breaking of glass and moonlight that marks the trees' arrival outside.
What are the answers to the textbook questions?
What three things cannot happen in a treeless forest?
According to the first stanza, in the forest without trees "no bird could sit", "no insect hide" and "no sun bury its feet in shadow".
The absence of trees means there is no perch for birds, no hiding place for insects, and no shade for the sun's rays to fall into.
What does "the sun's feet in shadow" picture, and what might the "feet" mean?
The phrase pictures sunlight falling in patches on the forest floor, broken up by shade, as though the sun's rays were feet sinking into pools of shadow cast by leaves and branches. The "feet" could mean the lowest, ground-level rays of sunlight that would normally be hidden among tree shadows.
Where are the trees, and what do their roots, leaves and twigs do?
The trees are inside the house, with their roots caught "in the cracks / in the veranda floor". Their roots work all night to disengage themselves, their leaves strain towards the glass, and their small twigs grow "stiff with exertion" as they try to move outward.
What does the poet compare the branches to?
The poet compares the "long-cramped boughs" to "newly discharged patients / half-dazed, moving / to the clinic doors", picturing the branches as weak, disoriented people leaving a hospital after a long stay.
How does the poet describe the moon, and what causes the change?
At the start of the third stanza the "whole moon shines / in a sky still open".
By the end of the fourth stanza "the moon is broken like a mirror, / its pieces flash now in the crown / of the tallest oak." The change is caused by the glass breaking and the trees stumbling out, scattering the moon's light among the branches of the oak.
What happens to the house, and why might the poet stay silent about the forest's departure?
The house loses its trees as "the glass is breaking" and the trees move out into the night while winds "rush to meet them".
The textbook suggests the poet may stay silent in her letters because people are often silent about important happenings that are so unexpected that they embarrass them, a hedge the poem itself does not resolve directly.
What might the poem mean, and how does it compare with other poems?
The textbook offers two readings: that the poem shows a conflict between man and nature, with plants used for "interior decoration" in cities needing to "break out" while forests are cut down elsewhere; or that the trees are symbolic of human beings, a recurrent image in Rich's poetry.
It also invites a comparison with "On Killing a Tree" by Gieve Patel, .
How does the poem relate to "A Tiger in the Zoo"?
The textbook itself asks readers to compare "The Trees" with "A Tiger in the Zoo" and consider whether both poems present a conflict between man and nature (question 4(i) in the chapter's own exercises).
In "The Trees", plants kept indoors for "interior decoration" are shown straining and struggling to escape back to the forest, much as a caged animal might long for the wild rather than the space built for human convenience.
This comparison invites the reader to see the house-plants as "imprisoned", confined to a veranda and a house rather than left to grow freely in the forest "that was empty all these days" until they returned to it.
The roots cracked into the veranda floor, and the leaves straining "toward the glass", can be read as images of captivity similar in spirit to the bars of a cage, even though the poem itself never uses the word cage and keeps its imagery rooted in plants rather than an animal.
The textbook's own phrasing, "does the poem present a conflict between man and nature", does not give a single correct answer, it simply invites the comparison. So any full answer should explain both poems' shared idea of a confined natural creature or plant finally breaking out into freedom, while also noting the difference: "The Trees" works through plants moving by themselves at night, with no human captor named, whereas "A Tiger in the Zoo" describes a tiger kept deliberately behind bars for people to watch.
Taken together, both poems ask the reader to think about what it costs nature, whether animal or plant, to be kept for human use or pleasure rather than left in its own setting.
What does the poem suggest about trees as a metaphor for human beings?
The textbook notes that Adrienne Rich has used trees as a metaphor for human beings elsewhere in her poetry, and asks what new meanings emerge from "The Trees" if its trees are read this way, in question 4(ii).
On this reading, the boughs "shuffling under the roof / like newly discharged patients / half-dazed" could suggest people leaving behind a long period of confinement, perhaps illness or restriction, still disoriented but moving forward all the same.
The roots working "all night" to "disengage themselves from the cracks / in the veranda floor" could then represent the slow, effortful process by which a person frees themselves from a situation that has trapped or rooted them in place against their will, an effort that takes patience and strain rather than a single dramatic step.
The twigs described as "stiff with exertion" extend this human comparison further, suggesting the physical toll that breaking free can take, much as a person might feel strained or tense after a long struggle to change their circumstances.
Read this way, the final image of the moon "broken like a mirror" scattering light through the "crown / of the tallest oak" could suggest that such a breaking-free, however disruptive, ultimately changes the wider world for the better, letting light reach places it could not before, just as a person's own freedom might change the lives of those around them.
The chapter leaves this as one of "two suggestions" for meaning and openly invites readers to "think of others", so no single metaphorical reading is presented as the only correct one.
Why might the poet not mention the departure of the forest in her letters?
In the third stanza, the speaker sits writing "long letters / in which I scarcely mention the departure / of the forest from the house", even while the escape is happening around her.
The textbook's own question, 3(iii), suggests this could be because people are often silent about important happenings that are "so unexpected that they embarrass us".
This hedge in the textbook's phrasing, using "could it be" rather than a firm claim, matters: the poem does not explain the silence directly, it only shows the speaker's letters continuing as normal while something extraordinary unfolds just outside the open doors to the veranda.
The contrast between the calm, ordinary act of "writing long letters" and the dramatic breaking of glass and stumbling trees in the final stanza heightens this sense that the speaker is avoiding, or unable to fully register, the scale of what is happening around her.
The chapter also asks readers to "think about this again" when answering the later set of questions on the poem's possible meanings, linking the speaker's silence to the larger idea that people, or plants read as a metaphor for people, may struggle to speak openly about change that feels too sudden or unsettling to put into words, even in something as personal as a letter.
The speaker's description of her own head as "full of whispers / which tomorrow will be silent" reinforces this theme of things left unsaid, as even her private thoughts are described as faint and short-lived rather than spoken aloud.
Glossary
- disengage themselves — to separate themselves, as the roots do from the cracks in the veranda floor
- strain — make efforts to move, as the leaves do towards the glass
- bough — a branch of a tree
- shuffling — moving repeatedly from one position to another
- lichen — crusty patches or bushy growth on tree trunks or bare ground, formed by the association of a fungus and an alga
- exertion — physical effort or strain
- veranda — a covered, open area attached to the outside of a house
- discharged — released, as a patient is released from hospital care
- half-dazed — partly confused or unsteady, as if not fully aware of one's surroundings
- stumbling — moving unsteadily, almost falling, while trying to walk or move forward
- crown — the uppermost spreading part of a tree, formed by its branches and leaves
- whispers — soft, quiet sounds or voices, barely audible
- departure — the act of leaving
- feminist — someone who supports equal rights and opportunities for women
- radical — holding views that favour thorough or extreme change
Common errors and misconceptions
- Misconception: the poem is only a literal account of house-plants moving. Correct: the textbook invites readings of the trees as symbolic, including as a conflict between man and nature or as a metaphor for human beings.
- Misconception: the trees were always outside and simply return to a forest they already knew. Correct: the poem states the forest "was empty all these days" until the trees inside the house move out into it.
- Misconception: the moon breaks because of a storm. Correct: the poem links the moon becoming "broken like a mirror" to the breaking glass and the trees stumbling out, not to any storm.
- Misconception: the speaker fully describes the forest's departure in her letters. Correct: she "scarcely" mentions it, suggesting a reluctance or inability to speak of it directly.
- Misconception: "feet" in "sun bury its feet in shadow" refers to a literal body part. Correct: it is a figurative image for the lowest rays of sunlight sinking into shade.
- Misconception: the poem has a regular rhyme scheme. Correct: it is written in free verse without a fixed rhyme pattern, relying instead on imagery and enjambment.
- Misconception: the simile of "newly discharged patients" describes the leaves. Correct: it describes the "long-cramped boughs", not the leaves.
Exam-style questions with model answers
Q1. According to the first stanza, what three things could not happen in the forest when it was empty of trees? [3 marks]
- No bird could sit in the forest.
- No insect could hide there.
- No sun could bury its feet in shadow, since there was no shade for it to sink into.
Q2. What do the trees' roots do at night, according to the second stanza? [2 marks]
- The roots work all night.
- They try to disengage themselves from the cracks in the veranda floor.
Q3. Using four separate details from the second stanza, describe how the trees move out of the house. [4 marks]
- The roots work all night to disengage themselves from the cracks in the veranda floor.
- The leaves strain toward the glass, trying to reach the outside.
- The small twigs grow stiff with exertion from the effort of moving.
- The long-cramped boughs go shuffling under the roof, compared to newly discharged, half-dazed patients moving to clinic doors.
Q4. What change does the poet describe in the moon between the third and fourth stanzas, and what causes it? [3 marks]
- At the start of the third stanza, the whole moon shines in a sky still open.
- By the end of the fourth stanza, the moon is broken like a mirror, its pieces flashing in the crown of the tallest oak.
- This change is caused by the glass breaking and the trees stumbling forward into the night, as the winds rush to meet them.
Q5. Explain why the poet might not mention the forest's departure in her letters, and what this suggests about human reactions to unexpected events, with reference to the poem. [5 marks]
- The speaker writes long letters while the trees are already leaving, but "scarcely" mentions this departure.
- The textbook's own question suggests people are often silent about important happenings.
- This silence may happen because such events are so unexpected that they embarrass people.
- The contrast between the calm act of letter-writing and the dramatic breaking glass and stumbling trees heightens this sense of avoidance.
- The poem leaves this reason as a possibility rather than stating it directly, so readers are invited to think about why people stay quiet about disruptive change in their own lives, just as the speaker does here.
Q6. What similes does the poet use to describe the boughs and the moon? [2 marks]
- The boughs are compared to "newly discharged patients" who are "half-dazed" and moving to clinic doors.
- The moon at the end of the poem is compared to a broken mirror, its pieces flashing in the crown of the tallest oak.
Key takeaways
- "The Trees" imagines house-plants coming alive at night and returning to the forest they were taken from.
- The roots, leaves, twigs and boughs are all personified, struggling to free themselves from the house.
- The boughs are compared to "newly discharged patients" moving, half-dazed, to clinic doors.
- The speaker writes letters inside but "scarcely" mentions the forest's departure happening around her.
- The whole moon of stanza three becomes "broken like a mirror" by the end of the poem.
- The textbook suggests two readings: a conflict between man and nature, or trees as a metaphor for human beings.
- The poem uses free verse, personification, simile and strong sound and sight imagery throughout.
- Adrienne Rich, born in Baltimore in 1929, has been called a feminist and a radical poet.
Test yourself
What three things could not happen in the empty forest, according to stanza 1?
No bird could sit, no insect could hide, and no sun could bury its feet in shadow in the treeless forest.
Where exactly were the trees before they moved out into the forest?
They were inside a house, with their roots caught in the cracks of the veranda floor.
What simile describes the boughs shuffling under the roof?
They are compared to newly discharged, half-dazed patients moving to clinic doors.
What does the speaker do while the trees are escaping?
She sits inside writing long letters, scarcely mentioning the forest's departure from the house.
How does the moon change between stanza 3 and stanza 4?
It goes from a whole moon shining in an open sky to being broken like a mirror, its pieces flashing in the tallest oak's crown.
What two readings of the poem's meaning does the textbook suggest?
A conflict between man and nature, with plants imprisoned for decoration, or trees as a metaphor for human beings, as Rich often uses them.
What happens to the glass in the final stanza?
The glass is heard breaking as the trees stumble forward into the night and the winds rush to meet them.